Down site

file down site

When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You must share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And when you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you will need to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as Gmail.

Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.



There are probably the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)



Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.





The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

You will find a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.



File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

p2p 순위 Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.